NSR250.net Forums Logo: Honda NSR 250 Forums, Classifieds and Service Manual in English. Covering All Honda NSR 250 MC16, MC18, MC21 and MC28 models
NSR250.net Forums

#
 
#
 
Performance Engineering

  • NSR250 Forums Index ‹ NSR250R Discussion
  • Members Content
  • Members Garage
  • Subscription
  • Transactions
  • FAQ
  • Search
  • Register
  • Log in

MC21 Geometry issues.


Reply to topic   printer-friendly view
Page 1 of 1   Download Topic





das134
Supporter - Titanium
Supporter - Titanium
 
Posts: 153
Joined: 04 May 2011

Location: New Zealand
1991 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

MC21 Geometry issues.

Wed May 02, 2012 5:55 am » Post: #1 » Download Post

Hey guys,

I have an MC21 that has been slightly changed over the years by previous owners and myself. I need some advice with a set up issue.

Firstly, fitted to the bike are '95 ZXR750 forks/triples, running the standard front wheel. The rear is an SP shock with standard SP (red) spring. I have done no valving/rebuilding work, though that is the plan when money permits.

The issue I have is that I believe the front forks as they MAY sit the front end up too high. When static the bike appears to be balanced front and rear, but when loaded and moving it looks (from pictures) like the rear sits too low/or the front is too tall. What I want to determine is whether it is more likely that I have a rear spring issue, or are my forks positioned incorrectly from the get go?

- Forks/triples are 1991-4 ZX7R. They are sitting about 6mm out of the top clamp.
- Rear definately does sag with a rider more than i would like.

Is there some form of basic geometry settings that I can apply to the bike to get a good starting point?

What is the length of the standard 21 forks? If they are longer than the ZXR ones that would indicate the problem is with the rear, yes?


Also, what rear spring options do i have available to harden it up? I hear HRC ones are available, but where do you get them? What about K-Tech?
Back to top


das134
Supporter - Titanium
Supporter - Titanium
 
Posts: 153
Joined: 04 May 2011

Location: New Zealand
1991 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Wed May 02, 2012 6:03 am » Post: #2 » Download Post

Oh and yes the forks are designed for a heavier bike and should be resprung. But position in the clamps is something I would like to determine.
Back to top


Hermit

 
Posts: 588
Joined: 08 Jun 2005

Location: Paraparaumu, New Zealand
1992 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Wed May 02, 2012 6:05 am » Post: #3 » Download Post

Need photos really mate, but its usually the rear spring sagging too much that makes them look nose high in riding pictures.
_________________
After years of moaning about immigrants now i am one...
Back to top


das134
Supporter - Titanium
Supporter - Titanium
 
Posts: 153
Joined: 04 May 2011

Location: New Zealand
1991 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Wed May 02, 2012 6:30 am » Post: #4 » Download Post

Hermit wrote:Need photos really mate, but its usually the rear spring sagging too much that makes them look nose high in riding pictures.


Will get on to better photos, but here is an average one under power down the straight.


Spring options though? Rebuilding the shock is fine but how to up the spring rating?

Mod edit: BB code correction, please check your image codes are correct FY
Back to top


Hermit

 
Posts: 588
Joined: 08 Jun 2005

Location: Paraparaumu, New Zealand
1992 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Wed May 02, 2012 9:07 am » Post: #5 » Download Post

Actually the fork does look long in that pic. The gap between the front of the lower fairing and the ground seems wide. Also the problem can be exaggerated by having a 120/70 front tyre. A 120/60 would lower the front wheel closer to the floor slightly.

What's your laptime at Ruapuna on the NSR?
_________________
After years of moaning about immigrants now i am one...
Back to top


TuckerBag

 
Posts: 259
Joined: 05 Apr 2010

Location: New Zealand. - Plastic Supporter - ZipTie/Duct Tape 1989 NSR250R SP MC18 R6k 1993 NSR250R SE MC21 R9
    Send private message View user's profile Visit poster's website
    Reply with quote  

Wed May 02, 2012 8:03 pm » Post: #6 » Download Post

Here are 2 threads that might be of interest to you?

http://www.nsr250.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11032

http://www.nsr250.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8292

But for what it is worth, the length of an assembled MC18 R5k fork (with no load on it) from the centre of the front axle to the top of the stanchion is about 722mm.
What is this measurement for your forks? Are they '95 ZXR750 or 1991-4 ZX7R?

Also, if you do end up raising the drive sprocket (in relation to the rear axle), it may induce a bit more antisquat.
<edit> Actually, after thinking about that a bit, I think that is wrong. The NSR generally is set up to squat the rear suspension under power. </edit>
_________________
[color=#808080][size=9]Yes,.. I too know how to waste Time and Money,...
Back to top


das134
Supporter - Titanium
Supporter - Titanium
 
Posts: 153
Joined: 04 May 2011

Location: New Zealand
1991 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Tue May 08, 2012 1:42 am » Post: #7 » Download Post

TuckerBag wrote:Here are 2 threads that might be of interest to you?

http://www.nsr250.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11032

http://www.nsr250.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8292

But for what it is worth, the length of an assembled MC18 R5k fork (with no load on it) from the centre of the front axle to the top of the stanchion is about 722mm.
What is this measurement for your forks? Are they '95 ZXR750 or 1991-4 ZX7R?

Also, if you do end up raising the drive sprocket (in relation to the rear axle), it may induce a bit more antisquat.
<edit> Actually, after thinking about that a bit, I think that is wrong. The NSR generally is set up to squat the rear suspension under power. </edit>


I'll measure mine up tonight. They are 91-94 model forks, and i was pretty sure they were around the 700mm mark. But I may well be wrong. I'd be interested to see if dropping the triple clamps causes the tyre to rub on the plug lead though...

Yes I'm currently running a 120/17 Racetec front. I know it's not ideal but the tyre was free and it handles ok so far.. Have a 110 supercorsa on the way though.
Back to top


das134
Supporter - Titanium
Supporter - Titanium
 
Posts: 153
Joined: 04 May 2011

Location: New Zealand
1991 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Tue May 08, 2012 1:51 am » Post: #8 » Download Post

Hermit wrote:Actually the fork does look long in that pic. The gap between the front of the lower fairing and the ground seems wide. Also the problem can be exaggerated by having a 120/70 front tyre. A 120/60 would lower the front wheel closer to the floor slightly.

What's your laptime at Ruapuna on the NSR?


Looks like the ZX7R forks are 29" in length as opposed to 28" as MC21 originals (correct me if that is wrong). So what's the easiest answer? Drop the triples by an inch/25mm or so?

Do the original forks sit flush with the top triple? I can get it close to standard then set sag if I have enough info. Anybody?

Unsure of laptimes, that picture was the first proper Ruapuna outing on that bike, and it was wet. But without a doubt in the low 30s Rolling Eyes
Back to top


Reply to topic   printer-friendly view
Page 1 of 1   Download Topic

NSR250R Discussion

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

  • NSR250 Forums Index
  • All times are GMT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Hosted by NSR250dotNET © 2008 NSR250dotNET