NSR250.net Forums Logo: Honda NSR 250 Forums, Classifieds and Service Manual in English. Covering All Honda NSR 250 MC16, MC18, MC21 and MC28 models
NSR250.net Forums

#
 
#
 
Performance Engineering

  • NSR250 Forums Index ‹ NSR250R Discussion
  • Members Content
  • Members Garage
  • Subscription
  • Transactions
  • FAQ
  • Search
  • Register
  • Log in

HRC Ignition (Stator & Flywheel)


Reply to topic   printer-friendly view
Page 1 of 1   Download Topic





RichG

 
Posts: 1128
Joined: 11 Feb 2008

Location: Leeds, UK
1992 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile Visit poster's website
    Reply with quote  

HRC Ignition (Stator & Flywheel)

Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:42 am » Post: #1 » Download Post

Does anyone know the details of part 31100-NKD-970.
Is this for a MC21 & 28? If used on a 21, does it significantly advance the ignition? What type of fuel, AVGAS only or also premium unleaded.
Many thanks
_________________
Rich
MC21 Track Bike / RS250 NF5 'Spencer', NX5 'Cadalora' & NXA 'Aoyama' / RS500 / Two Brothers Racing RC30
Back to top


Andy
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11949
Joined: 19 Jan 2004

Location: Devon, UK
1991 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:43 pm » Post: #2 » Download Post

MC28, for the PGM-IV.

It's light, compared to a standard MC21 flywheel, but I wouldn't necessarily expect it to be a significant improvement over a lightened MC21 flywheel unless the static timing is the same (or better) than the MC21's.*

* I doubt it is, as it's designed to be used in conjunction with the HRC card and PGM-IV ignition, but this is pure speculation and until someone tries it on the dyno, is my best guess!

Too light on the flywheel also isn't necessarily a good thing, unless you are God on a bike! I was able to out-drag Steve's F3 on a few occasions (with the "old" F3 setup) as the inertia from my heavier flywheel (and a little bit of a weight advantage, so he claims! Wink) would help grunt out of the corners better. He's also got larger flywheel on his now, and says it's noticeably better, also it will naturally have lost a tiny bit of its "bing... bing... bing" when you blip the throttle. (You'd know what I mean by "bing" if you heard it with the 88~89 flywheel!)
_________________
Andy.
NSR-WORLD.COM

Please keep all responses to Forum posts on the Forum so that others may benefit.

Please DO NOT PM me for technical advice. My time is precious, and you will probably receive a faster response on the Forum anyway.


Check us out on Facebook! Please "like" our page!
Back to top


mixalisen
Supporter - Titanium
Supporter - Titanium
 
Posts: 325
Joined: 17 Dec 2005

Location: Greece
1995 Honda NSR250 MC28SP
    Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail
    Reply with quote  

Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:23 pm » Post: #3 » Download Post

Nice info Andy...

I have an MC28 HRC Fly Wheel and stator and looking forward to see in the dyno the differences... I will post the results when i have them...I hope within the next 10 years... ROTFLMAO

Tonight when i will go home i will weigh the HRC Fly wheel to see the difference from the stock...

First question...: If i use the HRC Fly wheel with 030 card can i use Unleaded Fuel (98 octane and up of course)

Second question...: If i use the HRC Fly Wheel with 010 card do i have use only avgas...?

Cheers
michael
Back to top


Andy
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11949
Joined: 19 Jan 2004

Location: Devon, UK
1991 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:12 pm » Post: #4 » Download Post

I can only tell you what HRC say, and that's the 010 card is for leaded race fuel.

The flywheel and stator is the same part number in the U/L and leaded book though.

Fontyyy's happily ran 97/98 U/L with the 030 card (and other mods), and made around 62hp.
_________________
Andy.
NSR-WORLD.COM

Please keep all responses to Forum posts on the Forum so that others may benefit.

Please DO NOT PM me for technical advice. My time is precious, and you will probably receive a faster response on the Forum anyway.


Check us out on Facebook! Please "like" our page!
Back to top


mixalisen
Supporter - Titanium
Supporter - Titanium
 
Posts: 325
Joined: 17 Dec 2005

Location: Greece
1995 Honda NSR250 MC28SP
    Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail
    Reply with quote  

Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:18 pm » Post: #5 » Download Post

Thanks Andy...

Just came back home from work and made the comparison...

Stock Fly wheel with stator weights 1.8 Kg...
HRC MC28 Fly Wheel and stator weights 0.9 Kg... Exactly the half... Razz

Cheers
Michael
Back to top


StephenRC45
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 4884
Joined: 28 Jan 2004

Location: Cornwall, England
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:44 pm » Post: #6 » Download Post

You think thats light!

The F3 fly wheel weighs 460g as stock!

And the MC28 total loss fly wheel is only 380g!

I admit thats without the weight of the pickups.
_________________
If I have to take the carbs off once more...
Back to top


mixalisen
Supporter - Titanium
Supporter - Titanium
 
Posts: 325
Joined: 17 Dec 2005

Location: Greece
1995 Honda NSR250 MC28SP
    Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail
    Reply with quote  

Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:02 am » Post: #7 » Download Post

0,46 Kg....? This is light indeed Stephen..!!!
Back to top


StephenRC45
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 4884
Joined: 28 Jan 2004

Location: Cornwall, England
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:39 pm » Post: #8 » Download Post

Yes, 0.46kg.
_________________
If I have to take the carbs off once more...
Back to top


Kieran

 
Posts: 323
Joined: 02 Jan 2005

Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
    Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail
    Reply with quote  

Sat Feb 28, 2009 2:10 am » Post: #9 » Download Post

Thats half again... Twisted Evil
_________________
The Chopster
Back to top


StephenRC45
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 4884
Joined: 28 Jan 2004

Location: Cornwall, England
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:54 pm » Post: #10 » Download Post

But there is a trade off.

I've run them all and to be honest the largest of the F3 ones is best. The 88/89 ones are just too small and the motor lacks torque. I guess thats why they added almost 200g onto the later ones.

Mine with a later F3 wheel feels so much better even if it is a little less impressive when reving up without load.

Still F3 is F3 and is nearly always better than stock.... nearly.
_________________
If I have to take the carbs off once more...
Back to top


Andy
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11949
Joined: 19 Jan 2004

Location: Devon, UK
1991 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:57 pm » Post: #11 » Download Post

StephenRC45 wrote:
Still F3 is F3 and is nearly always better than stock.... nearly.

Very Happy
_________________
Andy.
NSR-WORLD.COM

Please keep all responses to Forum posts on the Forum so that others may benefit.

Please DO NOT PM me for technical advice. My time is precious, and you will probably receive a faster response on the Forum anyway.


Check us out on Facebook! Please "like" our page!
Back to top


Kieran

 
Posts: 323
Joined: 02 Jan 2005

Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
    Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail
    Reply with quote  

Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:19 am » Post: #12 » Download Post

Is the '88-89 NSR crank heavier than the F3 crank?
_________________
The Chopster
Back to top


StephenRC45
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 4884
Joined: 28 Jan 2004

Location: Cornwall, England
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:04 pm » Post: #13 » Download Post

No, the '88/'89 ones arn't
_________________
If I have to take the carbs off once more...
Back to top


Andy
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11949
Joined: 19 Jan 2004

Location: Devon, UK
1991 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:46 pm » Post: #14 » Download Post

It may be interesting to some that the kit RS125 crank is heavier than the stock one, for the same reason the F3 flywheel got a little heavier as it was developed.

There's not a great deal wrong with the standard crank really, except that it won't of course work with any of the F3 parts! It does need truing up however, and mass production manufacturing tolerances mean it's not always possible to get a stock crank absolutely true, so you ideally need to pick the best of a batch.
_________________
Andy.
NSR-WORLD.COM

Please keep all responses to Forum posts on the Forum so that others may benefit.

Please DO NOT PM me for technical advice. My time is precious, and you will probably receive a faster response on the Forum anyway.


Check us out on Facebook! Please "like" our page!
Back to top


Kieran

 
Posts: 323
Joined: 02 Jan 2005

Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
    Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail
    Reply with quote  

Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:21 am » Post: #15 » Download Post

Is the '88-89 NSR crank heavier than the F3 crank?


StephenRC45
No, the '88/'89 ones arn't



OOooooooohh. Interesting... Shocked
_________________
The Chopster
Back to top


Reply to topic   printer-friendly view
Page 1 of 1   Download Topic

NSR250R Discussion

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

  • NSR250 Forums Index
  • All times are GMT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Hosted by NSR250dotNET © 2008 NSR250dotNET