.....it so often comes down to me to reply to the questions....
Possibly because their comments can often be subject to uneccessarily sacrastic replies (many users do this). This may be true of many online forums, but the result is the same. I know it's your website mate, but if you want people to contribute freely, then you have to let them have some freedom over what they say and do.
....but I am pissed off that whoever supplied it has obviously removed the NSR-WORLD reference, and that's plain and simple piss-poor etiquette. They probably even claimed it was their own work.
Just like the reference to Honda that should have been on the diagram you copied in the first place? Yes, it is correct etiquette to provide acknowledgment of data sources, lest you be accused of plagarism.
I thought that one of the key objectives of a site such as this was to provide an environment where information is shared - surely there are no proprietry secrets involved. This guy spent a lot of time colouring a diagram (like I have) that was not otherwise available, for the benefit of any MC21 owner - it doesn't appear to be done for commercial advantage.
These are just some objective comments, don't let comments born from a lack of patience spoil an otherwise great site. My 2cents.